Main Menu

Intro) Listen to Muriel Gray lie

1) Muriel Gray's High Court claim 17 Dec 09 against Geoff Widders

2) Proof of the date of Geoff Widders novel

3) Muriel Gray lied to the audience

4) Costs and Gillian Cross

5) The Ancient 2000 does not exist

6) Deception Exposed

7) "A tomorrow's chip wrapper affair "

8) Muriel Gray "one of the most insulting things"

9) "best investigative journalism in the field today "

10) Support for a lie?

11) GW Book

12) Muriel Gray's "homage"(s)

LEGAL SECTION

Intro) Summary of LEGAL SECTION

A) Letter to Lord Woolf

B) "Suffer any wrong that can be done you rather than come here"

C) Appendix 2 : Declaratory Judgment

D) Appendix 3 : Law Commission

E) Mr Justice Roth's reply. GW comments

F) Complaint to the "Office for Judicial Complaints"

G) Complaint to the "Judicial Ombudsman"

H) Complaint to the "Solicitor's Regulation Authority "

H)i) Nichola Evans of Browne Jacobson fabricated costs

I) Chancery Division

J) Report of the Lord Neuberger Committee

K) Letter of Intent

SCALES OF JUSTICE

Intro) Scales of Justice

i) Pursuit of Justice OR Pursuit of Money and Power?

ii) Report of the Lady Neuberger Committee

iii) The Infallibility of Judges

CUSTOM SEARCH

RSS Feeds / Share

Subscribe in a reader

Read / Sample / Purchase Flight of the Shaman

"So obviously he was a nutter."

 

9) "the best investigative journalism in the field today”

 

The internet magazine article [Ansible 275] states that I issued a claim against Muriel Gray;-

“...asking not for damages but for an official ruling that Muriel Gray had told a fib and should jolly well be ashamed of herself.”

I have presented detailed accounts of my claim against Ms Gray, I have detailed the events of three court hearings, nowhere have I referred to my claim in terms of a “fib” or asking the court to rule that Ms Gray “should jolly well be ashamed of herself”.

In all my correspondence and on hewasanutter.com I state clearly that Muriel Gray lied.

The author of the article is referred to as “[JS]”, the article is linked to from Jim Steel's website – the link states;-

“Ansible 275

“For the best investigative journalism in the field today.”

 

If this is an example of investigative journalism then I think that the author of the article, “should jolly well be ashamed of themselves.”

8 Sept 2010

Jim Steel has now added to his article Ansible 275. He describes it as an, "attempt to summarize a long story" - it was not a summary, it was a deliberate attempt to ridicule and distort the true facts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

My undertaking If there is anything that I have stated on this site that is not correct; if Muriel Gray, Harper Collins, Browne Jacobson, or any person(s) mentioned in these pages, contacts me and provides the evidence or counter argument to show that I am not correct, or... if there is anything that I have stated that anybody believes misrepresents them in any way, if they provide me with their arguments... then, if necessary, I will consider removing the material, and/or publish a correction, and/or apologise. If I do not hear anything (nobody has complained to me since I set up this site in March 2010) then I can only assume the accuracy of everything on this site, and that nobody has been misrepresented in any way. G Widders

 

top